Search results

Ya, I hear ya. I nice Explorer motor with a stock HO cam in it or TFS Stage 1 would be nice later on.. Or some GT40P heads on that motor... Almost sounds to me like the cam is installed retarded 2* or MORE

Even with MAF a cammed stock headed 5.0 is not going to run like it should. It's going to be lacking the low end, and when it wants to rev the stock heads are out of breathe anyways. So you end up with a SUPER narrow band of power.

I couldn't believe he ripped off 1.81 60fts with it...lol. That pic was back with the 16" pony rims it has 17" 94-97 Cobra style rims now.

after I 1st installed the the SC a few years back..car had 150-155k on it then I think..can't tell by looking at it though...I detailed it all pretty nice plus the car has NEVER seen a single winter and stored inside. I'll get him on here...he isn't much for forums though...

I thought I'd toss this up since it is an example of keeping it simple and seeing good results. The car is an 89 GT, fully loaded with functioning A/C, a system, spare tire, 100% full weight roughly 3400lbs. ALL STOCK motor 5.0 motor, ARP headbolts and new headgaskets as only changes NOVI...

Speed Density actually runs really good until you get into heads/cam or a SC. I've had around 10-12 5.0 foxbodys and the SD ones ALWAYS were quicker with the normal bolts on vs. the MAF. 87-88 are the fastest foxbodys other than the 93 Cobra and even then a stripped down 87-88 coupe would...

The thread title should be: "How to make a Cat-Fish-Maro actually look good"

Insecure? What does he drive again? lol