Sounds like a centrifical SC will best fit for new 5.0. Centri dosnt require low comp pistons since they are not making boost under normal driving conditions.
[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_type_supercharger"]Centrifugal-type supercharger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File
aimler-Benz-DB_601A.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1a/Daimler-Benz-DB_601A.jpg/300px-Daimler-Benz-DB_601A.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/1/1a/Daimler-Benz-DB_601A.jpg/300px-Daimler-Benz-DB_601A.jpg[/ame] quote from this sorce
"Due to its design and lack of low-RPM boost it is often employed on near-standard compression engines. This means that it can facilitate airflow at higher engine RPMs, when most motors tend to have poor volumetric efficiency, without substantially increasing cylinder pressures at low- to mid-RPM operation, causing knock. This principle makes this type of supercharger ideally fit for a "bolt-on" type power adder, with no modification of the pistons and/or compression ratio necessary. Since gasoline must mix with air in a fairly narrow ratio to achieve combustion, the fact that centrifugals do not add much air at low and mid-range RPM's means fuel mileage is near-stock in the cruise RPM range. They appear to be most popular with cars that have a sufficiently large engine to provide adequate acceleration from a standing start without boost, while at the same time avoiding wheelspin."
For Turbo Vs S/C, also good info on Twin Screw, Roots & Centrifical SC's. Lot to read but good info. [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercharger"]Supercharger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:1968_AMX_blown_and_tubbed_e.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/73/1968_AMX_blown_and_tubbed_e.jpg/250px-1968_AMX_blown_and_tubbed_e.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/7/73/1968_AMX_blown_and_tubbed_e.jpg/250px-1968_AMX_blown_and_tubbed_e.jpg[/ame]