Nick ... its all about opinions and (not surprisingly) the people on a mustang board are more inclined to like the types of cars that are being voted on ... is it impressive that that car is as fast as it is? SURE but is practically brand new ... My 69, Alex's 67 and to a slightly lesser degree Aetos' car it is impressive that they are in as good shape as they are ... therefore people tend to lean more to them ... just sayin
Nick ... its all about opinions and (not surprisingly) the people on a mustang board are more inclined to like the types of cars that are being voted on ... is it impressive that that car is as fast as it is? SURE but is practically brand new ... My 69, Alex's 67 and to a slightly lesser degree Aetos' car it is impressive that they are in as good shape as they are ... therefore people tend to lean more to them ... just sayin
I wouldn't go that far lolol. no screaming chickens here... in fact i'm the only type of F-body that names a specific species in the model name...
HAWK it's a fireHAWK!!! lol. not a "lowly" WS6 model. firehawks were the only model that was factory rated at 345hp. WS6's had to get by on what? 325? and forget the formy and TransAm... and their 315 lol.
Just playin Aetos. Your car can destroy mine.... for now.... I might be looking for a cam, headers and a tune in 2011... depends on if i get the 9" rear or not.
I wouldn't go that far lolol. no screaming chickens here... in fact i'm the only type of F-body that names a specific species in the model name...
HAWK it's a fireHAWK!!! lol. not a "lowly" WS6 model. firehawks were the only model that was factory rated at 345hp. WS6's had to get by on what? 325? and forget the formy and TransAm... and their 315 lol.
Just playin Aetos. Your car can destroy mine.... for now.... I might be looking for a cam, headers and a tune in 2011... depends on if i get the 9" rear or not.