Search results

http://forums.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=1040987

GT40P heads/Explorer intake and leave the stock cam in it with some 1.7 rockers. The stock valve springs won't take much anyways. Plus there are ALOT of guys making good power this way and getting fast times. I think the fastest is a 11.9 NA with stock Exploder shortblock with a Mustang HO...

I've seen a dyno of GT40X with F-cam that was 290 rwhp, imho thats the only FRPP cam I'd try. Comp XE grinds are much better, and a custom even more so. Lunati, Crane, and Crower have some good ones as well. The Edelbrock E-Street heads are not a bad deal for around $899 new, you of course need...

http://www.bbkperformance.com/magazine_article.php?nak=15

Suppose to be 1500-6500 which is the same as the RPM II but the RPM II seems to make more power. I think the BBK has more down low though.

100% complete I can email pics of it installed. Switched out to a higher RPM intake ( Performer RPM II). http://www.americanmuscle.com/bbk-intake-manifold-86-93.html?utm_content=bbk-intake-manifold-86-93&utm_campaign=FROOG&utm_source=Google&utm_medium=Shopping $425 b/o it's $569 new

I believe you, they look that old by the condition.

Looks like they were replaced maybe along time ago from the oil built up. That looks like a really old cork gasket that has deteriorated to me. I have seen 2 different type intake gasket on original 5.0's. some have the orange print-o-seal type and some are the graphite coated style.

At the rear wheels you would be around 285-290 wiith the gt40x and rest of the stuff. Maybe more with a custom grind cam. Steeda # 18 and # 19 are also good cams, I'd take them over an E or B, but like the F cam. 350rwhp is tough without going to a stroker or a high revving 302 with big heads...

Yep, the Cobra's are like all other Ford where the calibration is done in the ECU. Aftermarket meters tell the computer there is less air coming in the motor to reduce fuel for larger injectors. I also used a 93 Cobra MAF on my 93 GT but it does lean the car out some so be careful. The 94/95...

Usually a rear main will soak the bottom of the tranny, exhaust, etc. I'd guess it was the PCV grommet or rear of intake leaking. Thats exactly what a few of my friends did.

I just saw this, sorry. I'll pm you.

Yes it does, you just bolt the actual sensor electronics into this larger housing. It works quite well.

You may actually be running lean and not rich. My cousin's car smelled really gassy and was idling at 16:1 A/F with a wideband. Check the plugs, exhaust smell is VERY deceiving. I had to burn him a chip because even with his 24lbers and calibrated MAF his A/F was way off.

Really?? Thats where I'm from LOL. My parents live right by Stewart's in Peru. I've had 5.0 Stangs since '98 ish and before that a 302 T-Bird and a 2.3 Turbo Coupe Bird..

Waterpump..crankshaft...ya thats the same thing LOL. Yea that was a huge waste of time. I've seen ONE broken crank and it was on my fathers 306 that was revved to 7400 and the balancer let go...I'll post up pics of that sometime lol.

So.....guess the motor wasn't blown after all...wasn't it a broken crankshaft?? :rolleyes:

Nice car man....

I have 2, but I'm quite a ways away

I will get you his #, I thought I had it in my phone but don't. My cousin might be selling his Paxton NOVI 1000 off his 89 GT as well.